Current:Home > ContactTennessee not entitled to Title X funds in abortion rule fight, appeals court rules -MarketLink
Tennessee not entitled to Title X funds in abortion rule fight, appeals court rules
View
Date:2025-04-13 05:30:27
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Federal officials do not have to reinstate $7 million in family planning grant funding to the state while a Tennessee lawsuit challenging federal rules regarding abortion counseling remains ongoing, an appeals court ruled this week.
Tennessee lost its bid to force the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to restore its Title X funding while the state challenged the federal Department of Health and Human Services program rules. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in upholding a lower court's ruling, did not agree with Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti's argument that the federal rules infringe on Tennessee's state sovereignty.
In a 2-1 finding, the judicial panel ruled Tennessee cannot use its state laws to "dictate" eligibility requirements for a federal grant.
"And Tennessee was free to voluntarily relinquish the grants for any reason, especially if it determined that the requirements would violate its state laws," the Monday opinion stated. "Instead, Tennessee decided to accept the grant, subject to the 2021 Rule’s counseling and referral requirements."
The Tennessee Attorney General's office has not yet responded to a request for comment.
The federal government last year pulled $7 million in Title X funding, intended for family planning grants for low-income recipients after Tennessee failed to comply with the program requirements to counsel clients on all reproductive health options, including abortion.
Inside the lawsuit
Title X funding cannot be allocated toward an abortion, but the procedure must be presented as a medical option. Tennessee blocked clinics from counseling patients on medical options that aren't legal in the state, which has one of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the country.
In the lawsuit filed in federal court last year, Skrmetti argued HHS rules about Title X requirements flip-flopped in recent years and that the HHS requirement violates Tennesseans' "First Amendment rights not to engage in speech or conduct that facilitates abortions."
After Tennessee lost the funding last year, Gov. Bill Lee proposed a $7 million budget amendment to make up for the lost funds that had previously gone to the state health department. The legislative funding may have hurt Tennessee's case to restore the federal funding as judges pointed to the available money as evidence Tennessee will not be irreparably harmed if HHS isn't forced to restore its funding stream.
Last August, the federal government crafted a workaround and granted Tennessee's lost funds to the Virginia League for Planned Parenthood and Converge, which distributed them to Tennessee organizations. The funds are earmarked for family planning services for low-income residents and directly bypass the state health department, which previously distributed the grants.
Skrmetti filed the lawsuit against the HHS two months later.
Latest federal funding fight
The family planning funding was the second federal funding fight to erupt in 2023.
In January 2023, Tennessee announced it would cut funding for HIV prevention, detection, and treatment programs that are not affiliated with metro health departments, rejecting more than $4 million in federal HIV prevention funds.
Tennessee said it could make up the lost fund with state dollars but advocates decried the move and its potential impact on vulnerable communities as the state remains an HIV-transmission hotspot. The Commercial Appeal, part of the USA TODAY Network, later confirmed Tennessee gave up funding after it tried and failed to cut out Planned Parenthood from the HIV prevention grant program.
veryGood! (63676)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- This Dime-Sized Battery Is a Step Toward an EV With a 1,000-Mile Range
- Aruba Considers Enshrining the ‘Rights of Nature’ in Its Constitution
- In Braddock, Imagining Environmental Justice for a ‘Sacrifice Zone’
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Environmentalists Want the FTC Green Guides to Slam the Door on the ‘Chemical’ Recycling of Plastic Waste
- Botched's Most Shocking Transformations Are Guaranteed to Make Your Jaw Drop
- Video shows bear stuck inside car in Lake Tahoe
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Inside Climate News Staff Writers Liza Gross and Aydali Campa Recognized for Accountability Journalism
Ranking
- Trump's 'stop
- The UN Wants the World Court to Address Nations’ Climate Obligations. Here’s What Could Happen Next
- Citing ‘Racial Cleansing,’ Louisiana ‘Cancer Alley’ Residents Sue Over Zoning
- US Emissions of the World’s Most Potent Greenhouse Gas Are 56 Percent Higher Than EPA Estimates, a New Study Shows
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Cocaine sharks may be exposed to drugs in the Florida Keys, researchers say
- Climate Change Enables the Spread of a Dangerous Flesh-Eating Bacteria in US Coastal Waters, Study Says
- Why Lola Consuelos Is Happy to Be Living Back At Home With Mark Consuelos and Kelly Ripa After College
Recommendation
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Women fined $1,500 each for taking selfies with dingoes after vicious attacks on jogger and girl in Australia
Where There’s Plastic, There’s Fire. Indiana Blaze Highlights Concerns Over Expanding Plastic Recycling
This Giant Truck Shows Clean Steel Is Possible. So When Will the US Start Producing It?
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Marylanders Overpaid $1 Billion in Excessive Utility Bills. Some Lawmakers and Advocates Are Demanding Answers
Awash in Toxic Wastewater From Fracking for Natural Gas, Pennsylvania Faces a Disposal Reckoning
Lisa Marie Presley’s Cause of Death Revealed